Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.612/2018

Case between B.M. Noorjahan et al vs Hysonmod Venture et al regarding dismissal of suit

Court
Court of the Third Addl. Munsiff & Rent Controller
Judge
Sri. Reghunath N.S.
Order Date
2024-03-06
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including B.M. Noorjahan and others, filed a suit against the defendants, Hysonmod Venture and other parties. The plaintiff's counsel indicated that the suit was not pressed, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed by the plaintiffs. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Not applicable

Judgment Evidence:

In the light of above endorsement, suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B.M. Noorjahan
Party Age
32
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
B.M. Nayim
Party Age
26
Relation
B.H. Mammi
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ameena Beegam
Party Age
15
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Hysonmod Venture
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
B.H. Maami
Party Age
78
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Manzoor Ali K.M
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K.M. Khadeeja
Party Age
44
Relation
B.H. Mammi
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Raihanath K.M.
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.K. Radhakrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.L. Sreedevi
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Chitra R. Shenoy
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
T.R.Harikrishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V.T. Raghunath
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohammed Subah
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
In the light of above endorsement, suit is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between B.M. Noorjahan et al vs Hysonmod Venture et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between B.M. Noorjahan et al vs Hysonmod Venture et al regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Fri, 03/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Sun, 03/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won