Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 223 /2023

Case between Binu vs Valsa Sajan, Bibin Sajan, Radhakrishnan Daniyel regarding suit filed under Section 26 read with Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-05-30
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Binu is the plaintiff in this case, while Valsa Sajan, Bibin Sajan, and Radhakrishnan Daniyel are the defendants. The suit was settled through mediation, and the terms were found to be lawful.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation, which were found to be lawful. The plaintiff is also entitled to a refund of court fee.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit as per the terms of the mediation, which were found to be lawful. The plaintiff is also entitled to a refund of court fee.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Supporting Evidence
The terms of mediation are found to be lawful.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Binu
Party Age
45
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Valsa Sajan
Party Age
65
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bibin Sajan
Party Age
36
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Radhakrishnan Daniyel
Party Age
55
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Paul K Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P Sathisan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vidhya T U
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Leena Varghese
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Suit is decreed as per terms of mediation.
Evidence:
Hence suit is decreed as per terms of mediation.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of court fee.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is entitled for refund of court fee under section 69A of Kerala Court Fee and Suit Valuation Act.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Binu vs Valsa Sajan, Bibin Sajan, Radhakrishnan Daniyel regarding suit filed under Section 26 read with Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Case Code Year
Case between Binu vs Valsa Sajan, Bibin Sajan, Radhakrishnan Daniyel regarding suit filed under Section 26 read with Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved
Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Thu, 05/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won