Case Summary
Binu Thomas filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against the RAK Tower Residents Association and several individuals. The court found sufficient grounds to grant the injunction to protect the petitioner's peaceful possession of property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Interim injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the petitioner to prevent the respondents from interfering with the property in question.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case which justified the granting of the injunction.
The petitioner made out a prima facie case which justified the granting of the injunction.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner made out a prima facie case which justified the granting of the injunction.
The petitioner made out a prima facie case which justified the granting of the injunction.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petitioner has made out a prima facie case and if order of temporary injunction is not granted, irreparable injury is likely to be caused to the petitioner.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondents and their men from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Binu Thomas
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- RAK Tower Residents Association
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- President, RAK Tower Residents Association
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Secretary, RAK Tower Residents Association
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasudeva Menon
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shobana
- Relation
- W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Augustus Binu
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anju Thomas M
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Govind VI
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nidheesh Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Anil Krishnan Nair
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Muhammed Jesseel
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mithun Baby John
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Nandhu S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Temporary Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Interim injunction restraining the respondents from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property.
Evidence:
Hence an order of interim injunction is passed restraining the respondents and their men from interfering with the peaceful possession and enjoyment of the plaint schedule property or from forcefully removing, damaging or tampering CCTV installed above the front door facing the corridor and from causing any mischief in relation thereto until further orders.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Binu Thomas vs RAK Tower Residents Association et al regarding temporary injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Binu Thomas vs RAK Tower Residents Association et al regarding temporary injunction