Case Summary
Bineesh V. Nair has filed a petition against Akash Ambily Suresh Kumar and others seeking an ad-interim injunction. The court is addressing the delay in issuing notice and the potential eviction of the petitioner from the property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court granted an ad-interim injunction to prevent the defendants from dispossessing the plaintiff from the property until a specified date.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The delay in notice issuance would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The delay in notice issuance would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The delay in notice issuance would defeat the purpose of the suit.
The delay in notice issuance would defeat the purpose of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the delay in issuing notice will defeat the purpose of the suit.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from dispossessing the petitioner/plaintiff from the plaint schedule property and forcefully evicting the petitioner/plaintiff otherwise than by due process of law.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bineesh V. Nair
- Party Age
- 43
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Akash Ambily Suresh Kumar
- Party Age
- 26
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ambily.V
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Ask Group Global Private Limited
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Emmanuel C.M
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt. Elizabeth Emmanuel
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. M. A. Andrews
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Permanent Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Ad-interim injunction restraining the defendants from dispossessing the petitioner from the property.
Evidence:
Hence, an ad-interim injunction is granted restraining the defendants/respondents from dispossessing the petitioner/plaintiff from the plaint schedule property and forcefully evicting the petitioner/plaintiff otherwise than by due process of law and from alienating or encumbering the plaint schedule property to any person other than the petitioner and from doing anything which will defeat the petitioners contractual rights over the plaint schedule property on the basis of the agreement for sale in any manner until 10/04/2025.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bineesh V. Nair vs Akash Ambily Suresh Kumar et al regarding ad-interim injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Bineesh V. Nair vs Akash Ambily Suresh Kumar et al regarding ad-interim injunction