Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.11/2014

Case between Bindu.C.G. vs SNDP regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Court
II Additional Munsiff Court
Judge
Maneesha K Bhadran
Order Date
2024-02-15
Duration
approximately-10 years 8 months
Case Closed
Thu, 02/15/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bindu.C.G. and Ajith C.G. are plaintiffs in this case against SNDP and other defendants. The suit was dismissed as not pressed after a settlement between the parties.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the parties reached a settlement.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as not pressed after the parties reached a settlement.
Key Reasoning:
Parties settled the matter.
Why Defendant Won:
Parties settled the matter.
Supporting Evidence
Submitted matter settled between parties.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed as not pressed. No costs.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindu.C.G.
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o Late A. Gopalan
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajith C.G.
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o late Gopalan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
SNDP, Sakha Yogam, Branch No. 1103
Relation
represented by its Secretary
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
District Collector, Ernakulam
Relation
Additional D2
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
The Headmaster, Government Junior Basic School, Poothotta.P.O.
Relation
Additional D3
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.G. Cletus
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
M. Rajasekharan Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anil.S.Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Rajani.K.N.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anila Peter
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Vivek George.J.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Not Decided
Description:
Suit not pressed.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff filed memo stating that suit not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bindu.C.G. vs SNDP regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure
Case Code Year
Case between Bindu.C.G. vs SNDP regarding suit filed under Section 26 and Order VII Rule 1 of The Code of Civil Procedure

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Sun, 06/15/2014 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/15/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases

Case between Garden View Apartment owners Association vs Ansal River Dale owners Association et al regarding Restoration Petition
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Shanoj R vs Joseph Augustin et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s Indo Quartz vs M/s Ray Engineering Pvt. Ltd. et al regarding petition under Order 38 Rule 5 of Code of Civil Procedure.
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between M/s. Canton Residency Pvt. Ltd. vs Kalamassery Municipality regarding dismissal of suit
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mrs. Julie Sebastian vs SREECHAND SPECIALITY HOSPITAL PVT. LTD. regarding settlement of claims.
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won