Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS. No. 643/2015

Case between Bindu vs Renjini regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction

Court
THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Judge
Smt. Sofia.T.A
Order Date
2025-08-11
Duration
approximately-10 years 0 days
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bindu as the plaintiff seeking a permanent prohibitory injunction and fixation of boundary against the defendant Renjini. The plaintiff claims that the defendant is attempting to encroach upon her property.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in part, restraining the defendant from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and fixing the northern boundary of the plaint A schedule property.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant and her men are restrained from trespassing into any portion of plaint A schedule property.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in part, restraining the defendant from trespassing into the plaintiff's property and fixing the northern boundary of the plaint A schedule property.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff demonstrated entitlement to the ownership and the right to a boundary fixation.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaintiff demonstrated entitlement to the ownership and the right to a boundary fixation.
Supporting Evidence
The available records reveal that there is a pathway available as per Ext.A4 (sale deed No.453/2003). The defendant has a way for ingress and egress to her property. There is no encroachment reported on the commission report.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed in part as follows: (I) The defendant and her men are restrained from trespassing into any portion of plaint A schedule property. (II) The northern side of the plaint A schedule property is fixed through line ‘AB’ as shown in Ext.C1(b).

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindu
Party Age
38
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Renjini
Party Age
37
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
General Power of Attorney, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 757/2015, Basic tax receipt No.2009274, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 453/2003, Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 1501/1995.
Defendants Documents
Location Map & Certificate, Letter No.04/A2/LSGD/TKVM from the Asst.Engineer, LSGD Section, Thrikkovilvattom Grama Panchayath, Land Tax Receipt.

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajeesh. T.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Salim Raj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Mohan.V
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The defendant and her men are restrained from trespassing into any portion of plaint A schedule property.
Evidence:
The defendant and her men are restrained from trespassing into any portion of plaint A schedule property.
Relief Type: Declaration
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The northern side of the plaint A schedule property is fixed through line ‘AB’.
Evidence:
The northern side of the plaint A schedule property is fixed through line ‘AB’ as shown in Ext.C1(b).

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Power of Attorney
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document establishing the authority of Radhakrishna Pillai to represent Bindu.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 757/2015 establishing the plaintiff's ownership of the property.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of payment of land tax for the plaintiff's property.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 453/2003 related to the defendant's property.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Certified copy of Partition Deed providing relevant boundaries.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Location Map
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Location Map of the defendant's property pertaining to the case.
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Letter
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Communication from Thrikkovilvattom Grama Panchayath regarding the property.
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land tax receipt in the name of Renjini.
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Land tax receipt in the name of Lekshmi D/o. Renjini.
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 595/2025.
Reference:
Ext.B5
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Certified copy of Sale Deed No. 3022/2003.
Reference:
Ext.B6
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Court-commissioned report detailing existing conditions of the property.
Reference:
Ext.C1 series
Document Type: Plan
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Plan illustrating the boundaries as part of the court's findings.
Reference:
Ext.C1(b)
Document Type: Asset Register Extract
Submitted By: Third party
Relevance:
Extract showing property details relevant to the case.
Reference:
Ext.X1 series

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Property and Possession Disputes
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Boundary Dispute
Case Code
Case between Bindu vs Renjini regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Bindu vs Renjini regarding partition and permanent prohibitory injunction

Quick Facts

Location
Kollam
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Case Filed
Tue, 08/11/2015 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Thomas Kanakan Mathen vs Janaki regarding fixation of boundary and injunction
Munsiff Court, Kollam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Stephen Nelson vs Sankaranarayanan Nair et al regarding fixation of boundary and for permanent prohibitory injunction.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Nizarudeen vs Oseela Beevi et al regarding Fixation of Boundary and Permanent Prohibitory Injunction.
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM.
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Rajendramany et al vs Secretary, Corporation, Kollam regarding Fixation of Boundary and Injunction.
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Mani.K vs Chandra Babu et al regarding Declaration, Fixation of Boundary and Injunction
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOLLAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won