Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 447/2021

Case between Bindu Satish @ Bindu Asok vs Kurian Abraham regarding dismissal of suit

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-16
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bindu Satish, is involved in a suit against the defendant, Kurian Abraham. The plaintiff's counsel submitted that Bindu Satish is not interested in proceeding with the suit, leading to its dismissal.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff expressed no interest in proceeding.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff expressed no interest in proceeding.
Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff expressed no interest in proceeding with the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff expressed no interest in proceeding with the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Submission of counsel for plaintiff is recorded. Suit is dismissed.

Judgment Evidence:

This suit came up before me for hearing on 16.01.2024 in the presence of the above said counsel and the court on the same day delivered the following: JUDGMENT. Plaintiff absent and represented. Counsel for plaintiff submitted that plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Submission of counsel for plaintiff is recorded. Suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindu Satish @ Bindu Asok
Party Age
54
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Kurian Abraham
Party Age
62
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
V. Philip Mathews
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Radhakrishnan. E
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Gibi George
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff was not interested in proceeding.
Evidence:
Counsel for plaintiff submitted that plaintiff is not interested in proceeding with suit. Submission of counsel for plaintiff is recorded. Suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bindu Satish @ Bindu Asok vs Kurian Abraham regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Bindu Satish @ Bindu Asok vs Kurian Abraham regarding dismissal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won