O.S No. 348/2020

Case between Bindu Renu Krishnan et al vs Tharakeswary Vasanthan et al regarding settlement dismissal

Court

THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Rohit Nandakumar

Order Date

2024-08-02

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, including Bindu Renu Krishnan and Renu Krishnan, are involved in a case against the defendants Tharakeswary Vasanthan and others. The matter was reported settled, and the case was dismissed as not pressed.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Plaintiff

Relief Granted

Case Type

Final Judgment

The court reported that the matter was settled and not pressed. Consequently, the suit was dismissed.

Why Plaintiff Won:

Losing Side's Weaknesses:

Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Matter reported settled. Not pressed. Endorsed in plaint. Dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Bindu Renu Krishnan
Party Age: 44
Relation: W/o

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Renu Krishnan
Party Age: 47
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Tharakeswary Vasanthan
Party Age: 54
Relation: D/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vivek Vasanthan
Party Age: 24
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Priya Chandrakumar
Party Age: 49
Relation: H/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P. Balan
Party Age: 86
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Cherian Sebastian
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Thomas M Jacob
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Akhil K Madhav
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: John Numpeli (Junior)
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: Ajith V
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification