Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.653/2020

Case between Bindu P. Hari alias Bindu P.H. vs Shajina et al regarding default dismissal of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-08-08
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bindu P. Hari, was absent while the defendants were represented. The court observed that the plaintiff was not interested in prosecuting the case further, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case further.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bindu P. Hari alias Bindu P.H. (47 years years) Lakshmi Mandiram, Baby Smaraka Road, Ernakulam, Kochi-682 026.

Defendants

Shajina (45 years years) 'Thazhathethil', Madavana Road, Pachalam P.O., Ernakulam, Kochi-682 012. A.M. Rasheeda (48 years years) Aliyam House, Madavana Road, Pachalam P.O., Ernakulam, Kochi-682012.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest to prosecute further.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 01/01/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases