Case Summary
The plaintiff, Bindu P. Hari, was absent while the defendants were represented. The court observed that the plaintiff was not interested in prosecuting the case further, leading to the dismissal of the suit.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in prosecuting the case further.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bindu P. Hari alias Bindu P.H.
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shajina
- Party Age
- 45
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.M. Rasheeda
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mohammed Siyad
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Rahib K.Y.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Mohammed Shareef Pariyarth
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Vishu Prasad P.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Rahul Sasi
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest to prosecute further.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bindu P. Hari alias Bindu P.H. vs Shajina et al regarding default dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Bindu P. Hari alias Bindu P.H. vs Shajina et al regarding default dismissal of suit.