Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1265/2022

Case between Bindhu Vimal vs Joe Thattil et al regarding non-prosecution of the suit.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Reeja R. Nair
Order Date
2025-12-03
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bindhu Vimal is the plaintiff, while Joe Thattil and Usha Jyothish Kumar are the defendants. The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of interest in proceeding with the case.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed as the plaintiff did not show interest to proceed and was absent during the hearing. The defendants argued that the suit had become infructuous.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff failed to file a proof affidavit and did not express interest in proceeding with the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of the view that the plaintiff is not interested to proceed further. The learned counsels for 1st and 2nd defendants submits that the suit has becomes infructuous. In the light of above circumstances, the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bindhu Vimal (44 years) Arackkal House, Poonithura village, Thammanam P.O, Pin-682032

Defendants

Joe Thattil (42 years) Divine Nagar, Thattil House, South Chittoor, Ernakulam Usha Jyothish Kumar (42 years) Panjavadi veettil, Poykattusherry Kara, Nedumbashery village, Chengamanad P.O, Aluva Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Evidence:
In the light of above circumstances, the suit is dismissed for non-prosecution interim orders stands vacated.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases