Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.540/2022

Case between Bindhu Lekha T vs Suseelan regarding dismissal for default

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-01-20
Duration
Case Code No.
540
Case Closed
Mon, 01/20/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bindhu Lekha T is the plaintiff who was absent during the proceedings, while Suseelan is the defendant represented in court. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and unrepresented.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's absence led to the dismissal of the case.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff is continuously absent. Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Judgment Evidence:

The suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bindhu Lekha T
Party Age
44
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Suseelan
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. P.S.Harikumar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.Biju
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. V.S. Bhasurendran Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Prasanth Pai
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Rahmathullah R
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Smt.Geethi.S.Bal
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Abhay Chandran B.S.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Rejected
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's continuous absence.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is continuously absent. Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represented, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
Mon, 01/20/2025 - 12:00
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won