Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No.391 /2021

Case between Biju. V vs K. Shafi regarding dismissal for default.

Court
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-04
Duration
Case Code No.
391
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Biju. V is the plaintiff who filed a suit against K. Shafi, the defendant. Both parties were absent during the hearing, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The case was dismissed due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendant.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the absence of both the plaintiff and defendant.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represent, the suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Biju. V
Party Age
44
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
K. Shafi
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. Hari. S. Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. S. Subha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. K. Sajid
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Muhammed Basheer. A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Prathap Ashish Nair
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default due to the absence of both parties.
Evidence:
Since, the plaintiff is neither present nor represent, the suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India et al vs Midhun. M regarding rejection of plaint
IN THE COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won