Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 212/2020

Case between Biju T. B vs Mr. Manu P. S et al regarding defamation and damages.

Court
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2024-12-02
Duration
approximately-4 years 22 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Biju T. B filed a suit against Mr. Manu P. S and Abilash for defamation, claiming that they falsely alleged he attended meetings under the influence of alcohol. The plaintiff asserts that these allegations harmed his reputation and caused emotional distress.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit, ruling that the plaintiff failed to prove defamation because there was no evidence that the alleged defamatory statements were published to others.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not provide sufficient evidence to support the claim of defamation.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is dismissed. The parties are directed to suffer their respective costs of the suit.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Biju T. B (43 years) Thottankarayil House, Manathu lane, Eroor P. O, Tripunithura.

Defendants

Mr. Manu P. S (39 years) Puthusserry House, Marana Road, Eroor P. O, Tripunithura. Abilash (26 years) Puthussery House, Pandath Road, Eroor P. O, Tripunithura.

Reliefs

Relief Type: Damages
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Compensation for defamation and damages caused by the defendants.
Evidence:
The issue I is to be answered as against the plaintiff.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Show Cause Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Issued by the defendants alleging the plaintiff attended meetings intoxicated.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: True copy of the reply to the show cause notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's response denying the allegations made against him.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: True copy of the Legal Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Legal notice regarding the defamatory allegations.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Additional proof of sending the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A4(a)
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Acknowledgment of receipt for the legal notice.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Returned Postal Envelop
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Returned envelope as proof of mailing.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Reply Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Another response related to the allegations.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Bye law of Aruvipuram Kudumba Unit
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Document submitted to support the defendants' position.
Reference:
Ext.B1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 12/02/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases