Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No. 866/2023

Case between Bide Sakthi Prakash vs Sajeesh Kumar C regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-09
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bide Sakthi Prakash filed a suit against Sajeesh Kumar C. The plaintiff was absent during the hearings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not present evidence, resulting in the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent. Today plaintiff is absent and not ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bide Sakthi Prakash (46 years) Flat No. P071, 7th Floor, Block No.P, DLF New Town Heights, Seaport Airport Road, Near CSEZ, Kakkanadu – 682 037

Defendants

Sajeesh Kumar C (43 years) Chithralayam, Chengana Desom, Payyanad P.O, Malappuram District, Pin – 676 122

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's case was dismissed due to continuous absence.
Evidence:
Defendant present. Plaintiff is continuously absent. Today plaintiff is absent and not ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases