Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No. 866/2023

Case between Bide Sakthi Prakash vs Sajeesh Kumar C regarding dismissal of suit.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-01-09
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bide Sakthi Prakash filed a suit against Sajeesh Kumar C. The plaintiff was absent during the hearings, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not present evidence, resulting in the dismissal of the case.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiff was continuously absent and did not present evidence, resulting in the dismissal of the case.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff's continuous absence led to dismissal of the suit.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent.

Judgment Evidence:

The court on the same day delivered the following: Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff is continuously absent. Today plaintiff is absent and not ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bide Sakthi Prakash
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Sajeesh Kumar C
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Ajeesh Babu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. K Sathyajith
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
V. R Jyothish
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Anitha Stanly T
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's case was dismissed due to continuous absence.
Evidence:
Defendant present. Plaintiff is continuously absent. Today plaintiff is absent and not ready for evidence in listed case. Dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bide Sakthi Prakash vs Sajeesh Kumar C regarding dismissal of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Bide Sakthi Prakash vs Sajeesh Kumar C regarding dismissal of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Wed, 01/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Fri, 01/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won