Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
R.C.P. No. 84/2024

Case between Betty Francis vs A.M. Aslam regarding rent control petition

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-10-04
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The petitioner, Betty Francis, filed a rent control petition against the respondent A.M. Aslam. The petition was dismissed as not pressed following a memo from the petitioner.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner. There were no costs awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner chose to withdraw the rent control petition.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence the rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Betty Francis (76 years) Pulikkal House, Mukkottil temple Road, Poonithura.P.O., Kanayannur Taluk, Ernakulam, Pin: 682304

Defendants

A.M. Aslam (Age not specified years) Kurumbelil House, Karpooramcherry, Vadakkevila Village, Pattathanam P.O., Kollam, Now doing business as Trivandrum Chicken Corner, No.C.C.61/4084, M.G. Road, Pallimukku, Cochin, Pin: 682016

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases