Case Summary
The petitioner, Betty Francis, filed a rent control petition against the respondent A.M. Aslam. The petition was dismissed as not pressed following a memo from the petitioner.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The rent control petition was dismissed as not pressed by the petitioner. There were no costs awarded.
Key Reasoning:
The petitioner chose to withdraw the rent control petition.
The petitioner chose to withdraw the rent control petition.
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner chose to withdraw the rent control petition.
The petitioner chose to withdraw the rent control petition.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the rent control petition is withdrawn and has filed a not press memo.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence the rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Betty Francis
- Party Age
- 76
- Relation
- W/o.Late P.L.Francis
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- A.M. Aslam
- Relation
- S/o.Abdul Muhammed
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- C.P. Peethambaran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arjun J. Das
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- P.K. Chandrasekaran Pillai
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence the rent control petition is dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Betty Francis vs A.M. Aslam regarding rent control petition
Case Code Year
Case between Betty Francis vs A.M. Aslam regarding rent control petition