Case Summary
Benzigar filed a suit for injunction against Vasanthi and Mary Madarthammal. The plaintiff was absent during the trial and did not present any evidence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of evidence. The defendants were awarded costs.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not appear or present any evidence.
The plaintiff did not appear or present any evidence.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not appear or present any evidence.
The plaintiff did not appear or present any evidence.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff remained absent and not ready to adduce any evidence.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Benzigar
- Party Age
- 65
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Vasanthi
- Party Age
- 37
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Mary Madarthammal
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- S.K.Reghupalan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Remya Reghupal
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Kottiyam G.Raveendran
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
This suit is filed by the plaintiff for Injunction but was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence suit dismissed for default with costs of defendants.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Injunction
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Benzigar vs Vasanthi, Mary Madarthammal regarding Injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Benzigar vs Vasanthi, Mary Madarthammal regarding Injunction