Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.500/2014

Case between Benny vs Antony et al regarding Permanent Prohibitory Injunction and Mandatory Injunction for Pathway Obstruction

Court
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Needi. K. Dinamany
Order Date
2025-02-12
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Case involves Benny, a photographer, suing a group of individuals for obstructing a pathway leading to his property, claiming ownership and seeking injunctive relief.

Judgment Outcome

Partial Relief
Interim Order
The suit for injunction was dismissed with costs.
Judgment Favored
Unknown
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Benny (44 years years) Aasaari Parambil, Thuthiyoor Karayil, Vazhakala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, CSEZ P O

Defendants

Antony (67 years years) Thuthiyoor Karayil, Vazhakala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, CSEZ P O Francis (65 years years) Thuthiyoor Karayil, Vazhakala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, CSEZ P O Raphel (61 years years) Thuthiyoor Karayil, Vazhakala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, CSEZ P O Alice (59 years years) Thuthiyoor Karayil, Vazhakala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, CSEZ P O Yesudas (40 years years) Thuthiyoor Karayil, Vazhakala Village, Kanayannur Taluk, CSEZ P O

Reliefs

Relief Type: Permanent Prohibitory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for injunction to restrain obstruction of pathway
Evidence:
Court finding against the plaintiff based on evidence
Relief Type: Mandatory Injunction
Outcome: Refused
Description:
Request for injunction to restore pathway after removing obstruction
Evidence:
Court finding against the plaintiff based on evidence

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Settlement Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Plaintiff's ownership and possession of the property
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Tax receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of tax payment by plaintiff for the property
Reference:
Document Type: Building Tax Receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of building tax payment by plaintiff for the property
Reference:
Document Type: Location Sketch
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing the lie and nature of the pathway
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Re-Survey Plan
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Showing the layout and boundaries of the property
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Partition Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Related to partition details of the defendants
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Complaint
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Filed before Ombudsman regarding the dispute
Reference:
Ext.B1
Document Type: Ombudsman Order
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Related to the dismissal of plaintiff's complaint
Reference:
Ext.B2
Document Type: Judgment
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Outcome of previous litigation relevant to the case
Reference:
Ext.B3
Document Type: Panchayath Report
Submitted By: Defendant
Relevance:
Report on the public pathway status
Reference:
Ext.B4
Document Type: Commission Report
Submitted By: Court
Relevance:
Report on the pathway based on investigation
Reference:
Ext.C1

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
50%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases