Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.647/2021

Case between Bency Baby vs Ashish Sudhakaran et al regarding suit dismissed for default.

Court
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SRI. REGHUNATH N.S.
Order Date
2024-01-22
Duration
approximately-2 years 4 months
Case Closed
Mon, 01/22/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff Bency Baby, represented by counsel, was absent on multiple occasions, leading the court to dismiss the suit. The defendants included Ashish Sudhakaran and other parties related to AIN Grocery Hypermart Pvt Ltd.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff failed to appear or present evidence after multiple opportunities.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit as the plaintiff failed to appear or present evidence after multiple opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff did not make an effort to pursue the case, resulting in dismissal.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff did not make an effort to pursue the case, resulting in dismissal.
Supporting Evidence
The plaintiff did not appear and adduce evidence. Hence, I am satisfied that petitioner is not interested in proceeding with suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default. No costs. Pronounced in the open court on this the 22nd day of January, 2024.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bency Baby
Party Age
32
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Ashish Sudhakaran
Party Age
40
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Nithin Baby
Party Age
27
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Dhanesh V .V.
Party Age
43
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Parvathy Asish
Party Age
40
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rinusa P Ashraf
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Biju M. John
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sheeba Varghese
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
P.M. Ziraj
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Dhany C.M.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit is dismissed for default due to plaintiff's absence.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bency Baby vs Ashish Sudhakaran et al regarding suit dismissed for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Bency Baby vs Ashish Sudhakaran et al regarding suit dismissed for default.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Wed, 09/22/2021 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 01/22/2024 - 12:00
From
Mon, 01/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 01/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won