Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO. 33 OF 2015

Case between Beeran Haji vs Ramya.K. regarding eviction and rent arrears

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt.NIMMI.K.K.
Order Date
2018-08-31
Duration
3 years
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Beeran Haji filed a petition seeking eviction of the respondent from the rented room due to rent arrears since 2013 and his bonafide need to start a Super Market in that commercially important area.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court granted eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule room due to rent arrears and the bonafide need of the petitioner to start a Super Market.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Eviction order, Arrears of rent with interest, Costs of proceedings recovery
Case Type
Rent Control - Eviction
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner proved rent arrears and bonafide need for the room, while the respondent failed to show possession of other rooms for her business.

Judgment Evidence:

The petition stands allowed u/s 11 (2), 11 (3) & 11 (4) (iii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent control ) Act 1965.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Beeran Haji (68 years) Vellarikkattu House, Thalakkad amsom, Tirur Taluk

Defendants

Ramya.K. (35 years) Adone Herbal Beauty Parlour, Seenath Complex, Near Viswas Theatre, B.P.Angadi, Tirur Taluk

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Eviction of the respondent from the petition schedule room
Evidence:
The petition stands allowed u/s 11 (2), 11 (3) & 11 (4) (iii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent control ) Act 1965.
Relief Type: Arrears of Rent
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Arrears of rent with interest from the respondent
Evidence:
The petition stands allowed u/s 11 (2), 11 (3) & 11 (4) (iii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent control ) Act 1965.
Relief Type: Costs of proceedings recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Recovery of costs of the proceedings from the respondent
Evidence:
The petition stands allowed u/s 11 (2), 11 (3) & 11 (4) (iii) of the Kerala Building (Lease and Rent control ) Act 1965.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of communication with the respondent regarding rent arrears.
Reference:
A1
Document Type: Acknowledgement Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the petition schedule room.
Reference:
A2

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur
Case Filed
Mon, 08/31/2015 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Private Individual

Similar Cases