Case Summary
The case involves Beena as the petitioner/accused and Aravinda Prasad as the respondent/complainant. Beena's petition was dismissed by the court.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The petition for the accused was dismissed by the court.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
The Petition is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Beena
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Aravinda Prasad
- Party Age
- 58
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Geo Paul
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- R. Gaganan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Refused
Description:
The petition is dismissed.
Evidence:
Therefore the respondent objected the allowing of petition at this stage.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Vaikom
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Beena vs Aravinda Prasad regarding dismissal of petition.
Case Code Year
Case between Beena vs Aravinda Prasad regarding dismissal of petition.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act