Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S No.53/2025

Case between Beejay Agencies vs Rasheed P.S regarding realization of money

Court
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Judge
Smt. Jyothi Babu R.
Order Date
2025-04-07
Duration
approximately-6 months
Case Closed
Mon, 04/07/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Beejay Agencies represented by its Proprietor Binoy Varghese, is seeking recovery of an amount due from the defendant, Rasheed P.S, for goods purchased on credit. The case was proceeded exparte due to the defendant's failure to appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹1,20,258 along with interest.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant to pay ₹1,20,258 with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit is decreed in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹1,20,258 along with interest.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.
Supporting Evidence
The plaint averments, affidavit and the documents would establish the case of the plaintiff. There is no evidence to rebut the evidence adduced on the side of the plaintiff.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows; It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹1,20,258/- (Rupees One Lakh Twenty Thousand Two Hundred and Fifty Eight only) with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum for the principal amount of ₹1,13,999/- (Rupees One Lakh Thirteen Thousand Nine Hundred and Ninety Nine only) from the date of decree till its realization.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Beejay Agencies represented by its Proprietor Binoy Varghese
Party Age
47
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Rasheed P.S
Party Age
59
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Invoice no.GO.1714/24-25, Cheque no.002977, Cheque returned Memo, Lawyer's Notice.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh Thomas Kandamchira
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover ₹1,20,258/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
Hence the plaintiff is entitled to the reliefs as claimed for.
Relief Type: Interest
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Interest on the principal amount of ₹1,13,999/- at the rate of 6% per annum.
Evidence:
It is ordered that the defendant to pay to the plaintiff the sum of ₹1,20,258/- with interest thereon at the rate of 6% per annum.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover costs from the defendant.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to realise the costs from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Invoice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document evidencing the amount due from the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Cheque
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Cheque issued by the defendant as payment for the amount due.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Cheque Returned Memo
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Memo indicating that the cheque was returned due to insufficient funds.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Lawyer's Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Notice sent to the defendant demanding payment after cheque bounced.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Receipt proving that the lawyer's notice was sent by post.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Acknowledgment card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Card showing the acknowledgment of receipt of the lawyer's notice.
Reference:
Ext.A6

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Cheque Bounce Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Cheque dishonour
Case Code
Case between Beejay Agencies vs Rasheed P.S regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Beejay Agencies vs Rasheed P.S regarding realization of money

Case Flags

Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Mon, 04/07/2025 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 04/07/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sat, 05/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between M/s. Swamy Electricals vs Dinu Chacko regarding realization of money.
The Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between K.G. Vijayakumar vs K.T. Sunilkumar regarding realisation of money based on a cheque
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Binumon P P vs Gautham Krishna regarding realization of money.
Court of the Munsiff, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Allianz Financial Corporation vs Santhosh regarding realisation of money
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Beejay Agencies vs Rasheed P S regarding suit for realisation of money.
Munsiff's Court, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won