Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 1660/2015

Case between Bean raj vs Bhaskara Nadar et al regarding non-prosecution of suit.

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2025-03-04
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 03/04/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bean raj is the plaintiff represented by Ajith E.S., while the defendants include Bhaskara Nadar and other family members. The case was dismissed for non-prosecution due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution as the plaintiff remained absent and did not file any proof affidavit.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for non-prosecution as the plaintiff remained absent and did not file any proof affidavit.
Key Reasoning:
The court found that the plaintiff showed no interest in continuing the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The court found that the plaintiff showed no interest in continuing the case.
Supporting Evidence
The learned counsel for plaintiff is seeking time for evidence inspite of posting for evidence of plaintiff. No petition to that effect also seen filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence this court is of view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further with this case. Hence suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bean raj
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ajith E.S.
Party Age
46
Relation
Power of attorney holder
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bhaskara Nadar
Party Age
82
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Prabhavathy Amma
Party Age
78
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Benraj
Party Age
49
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bijuraj
Party Age
34
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Beenaraj
Party Age
42
Relation
D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
P.A. Abdul Jabbar
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K.K. Nasseer
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
K. Mohana Chandran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Suit dismissed for non-prosecution.
Evidence:
Hence this court is of view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further with this case. Hence suit is dismissed for non-prosecution.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bean raj vs Bhaskara Nadar et al regarding non-prosecution of suit.
Case Code Year
Case between Bean raj vs Bhaskara Nadar et al regarding non-prosecution of suit.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
Tue, 03/04/2025 - 12:00
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Prakash Pai, et al vs Saju, et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Nithya vs Babu et al regarding Dismissal of Listed Case
THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Kunju Bava vs C. A Abdulla regarding specific performance of agreement and consequential reliefs
The Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won