Case Summary
The petitioner, Basheer, filed a restoration petition against the respondent, Hamza, due to their non-appearance. The court found sufficient grounds to allow the petition but also noted the need to consider the respondent's inconvenience.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Petition allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2500/-
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Final Judgment
No
The petition was allowed after consideration of the circumstances, with the requirement that costs be paid.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court was satisfied with the petitioner's grounds for non-appearance.
The court was satisfied with the petitioner's grounds for non-appearance.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The court was satisfied with the petitioner's grounds for non-appearance.
The court was satisfied with the petitioner's grounds for non-appearance.
Supporting Evidence
I am satisfied that the petition have a sufficient case for their non-appearance.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2500/- and it shall pay on or before 28-02-2019.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Basheer
- Party Age
- 1
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Hamza
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- K. Vipin
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Petition stands allowed on payment of costs.
Evidence:
Hence petition stands allowed on payment of costs of Rs. 2500/- and it shall pay on or before 28-02-2019.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Restoration Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
RESTOR.PTN
Case Code Year
2018