Case Summary
The case involves Bank of Baroda as the petitioner and Sumitha as the respondent. The petition was dismissed due to the absence of the petitioner and no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the petition due to the petitioner's absence.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
The petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
The petitioner was absent and no representation was made.
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Petition dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sumitha
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Injakkal. D. Pramod Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Case Code
RP.
Case Code Year
2023