Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 922 of 2020

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shyla K.K et al regarding realisation of money

Court
Court of the Principal Munsiff, Ernakulam
Judge
Smt. Rejani Thankappan
Order Date
2024-02-29
Duration
approximately-6 years 11 months 1 day
Case Closed
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

This case involves the Bank of Baroda suing Shyla K.K and Jayan for the recovery of a loan amount. The defendants failed to repay the loan as agreed, leading to the bank filing this suit.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the total outstanding amount with interest. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.1,62,103.80 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree, and thereafter @ 6% per annum from the date of decree till entire realization in full from the defendants and their assets.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed in favor of the plaintiff, allowing the bank to recover the total outstanding amount with interest. Additionally, the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaint averments stand proved from the unrebutted evidence of the plaintiff's witness and the marked documents.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The plaint averments stand proved from the unrebutted evidence of the plaintiff's witness and the marked documents.
Supporting Evidence
From the unrebutted evidence of PW1 and from Exts.A1 to A8 documents the plaint averments stands proved.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: A) The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.1,62,103.80 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank)
Relation
represented by its Manager
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Shyla K.K
Party Age
38
Relation
W/o. Jayan
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jayan
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o. Raghavan
Plaintiffs Documents
Application form for MSEs, Sanction letter, Loan agreement cum hypothecation deed, Letter of guarantee, Acknowledgment of liability, True copy of lawyer notice, Postal Acknowledgment card, Computer printout of statement of account for the period from 01.01.2015 to 12.09.2020
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh.G.Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy.A
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa N.U.
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff bank was allowed to recover Rs.1,62,103.80 along with interest.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is allowed to recover Rs.1,62,103.80 together with interest at the rate of 9% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff bank entitled to recover costs of the suit from the defendants.
Evidence:
The plaintiff bank is also entitled to get the costs of the suit from the defendants.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Application form for MSEs
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was part of the evidence to prove the plaintiff's claim.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sanction letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document evidenced the loan amount sanctioned to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan agreement cum Hypothecation Deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was crucial in establishing the terms of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of guarantee
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was presented to support the plaintiff's claim of the defendants' obligations.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document was used to demonstrate that the first defendant acknowledged the debt.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: True copy of Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document showed that the defendants were notified about the outstanding payment.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document confirmed receipt of the lawyer's notice by the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Computer printout of Statement of account
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document helped establish the outstanding amount due from the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A8

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shyla K.K et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Shyla K.K et al regarding realisation of money

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 03/28/2017 - 12:00
Case Closed
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
From
Thu, 02/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Thu, 02/29/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won