Case Summary
Bank of Baroda represented by its Senior Manager filed a suit against Sandeep S. and others. The court dismissed the suit as not pressed due to no representation by the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit filed by Bank of Baroda as the plaintiff did not appear to represent the case. The suit was not pressed and thus stands dismissed.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff's lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
The plaintiff's lack of representation led to the dismissal of the suit.
Why Defendant Won:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
No representation for plaintiff. Not press memo already seen filed.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed as not pressed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Sandeep S.
- Party Age
- 35
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anu Sandeep
- Party Age
- 29
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Shabu G.S
- Party Age
- 48
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Not press memo
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.T.J.Shakela Beegum
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit stands dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Hence suit stands dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sandeep S. et al regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Sandeep S. et al regarding dismissal of suit