Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 826 / 2024

Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s Bean Leaf Restaurant et al regarding realization of money

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany
Order Date
2025-07-18
Duration
approximately-5 years 11 months
Case Closed
Fri, 07/18/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The Bank of Baroda filed a suit against M/s Bean Leaf Restaurant and its partners for the realization of a defaulted loan. The loan was for Rs. 5,00,000/- borrowed for working capital, which the defendants failed to repay despite repeated requests.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay Rs. 7,38,525.69/- along with interest. The defendants are also liable for the costs of the suit.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Rs. 7,38,525.69/- along with interest @11.65% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and @6% from the date of decree till the date of payment.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, directing the defendants to pay Rs. 7,38,525.69/- along with interest. The defendants are also liable for the costs of the suit.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Plaintiff established its case by providing unchallenged documents detailing the loan agreement and defaults.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Plaintiff established its case by providing unchallenged documents detailing the loan agreement and defaults.
Supporting Evidence
On perusal of the plaint, proof affidavit and documents produced, I am of the view that plaintiff has established a case and plaintiff is entitled to realize an amount of Rs.7,38,525.69/- with interest from defendants.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, suit is decreed as follows: 1) Defendants shall pay Rs.7,38,525.69/- along with interest @11.65% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and @6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
M/s Bean Leaf Restaurant
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
George Mathew
Party Age
51
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Jisha Sam Anglimoottil
Party Age
41
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan sanction letter, Demand promissory note for Rs. 5,00,000/-, Letter of Installment with acceleration clause, Letter of Partnership, Declarations cum undertakings cum authority, Composite Hypothecation agreement, Letter of undertaking in respect of Book Debts, Power of attorney in respect of Book debts, Letter of acknowledgment of debt, Office copy of legal notice, Postal receipts, Certified true extract account statement of loan A/c No: 58860600000412
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aneesh K M
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Dileepchandran
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff directed to recover Rs.7,38,525.69/- from the defendants.
Evidence:
In the result, suit is decreed as follows: Defendants shall pay Rs.7,38,525.69/- (Rupees Seven lakhs thirty eight thousand five hundred twenty five and sixty nine paise only) along with interest @11.65% per annum from the date of suit till the date of decree and @6% from the date of decree till the date of payment or realization, as the case may be, to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Defendant declared personally liable for the decree debt.
Evidence:
Defendant shall be personally and his assets shall also be liable to satisfy the decree debt.
Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff entitled to recover the costs of the suit.
Evidence:
Plaintiff is also entitled to realize the costs of the suit.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows that plaintiff bank sanctioned mudra term loan facility of Rs.5,00,000/- to the defendants for working capital requirement.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Demand Promissory Note
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the defendants' promise to repay the loan amount of Rs.5,00,000/-.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Letter of installment with acceleration clause
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Details the repayment terms related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Letter of Partnership
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the partnership agreement among the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Declarations cum undertakings cum authority
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishes the authorities and declarations made by the defendants regarding the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Composite Hypothecation Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Outlines the terms of hypothecation related to the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Letter of undertaking in respect of Book Debts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Documents the undertaking made by defendants concerning the book debts of the business.
Reference:
Ext.A7
Document Type: Power of attorney in respect of Book debts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Grants power of attorney regarding the collection of book debts.
Reference:
Ext.A8
Document Type: Letter of acknowledgment of debt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Confirms the acknowledgment of debt by the defendants as of 03.08.2021.
Reference:
Ext.A9
Document Type: Office copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the legal notice sent to the defendants regarding the repayment.
Reference:
Ext.A10
Document Type: Postal Receipts
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proof of sending the legal notice to the defendants.
Reference:
Ext.A11
Document Type: Certified true extract account statement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Shows the account details related to the defendants' loan.
Reference:
Ext.A12

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s Bean Leaf Restaurant et al regarding realization of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs M/s Bean Leaf Restaurant et al regarding realization of money

Quick Facts

Location
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Thu, 08/08/2019 - 12:00
Case Closed
Fri, 07/18/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won