Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 450/2019

Case between Bank of Baroda vs Libu Eldose et al regarding Enquiry Petition

Court
THE MUNSIFF COURT, PERUMBAVOOR
Judge
Smt. Sumey Chandran
Order Date
2025-09-20
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The case involves Bank of Baroda as the decree holder against judgment debtors Libu Eldose and Eldose M K. The decree holder was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the execution petition.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The execution petition was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the decree holder, Bank of Baroda.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was continuously absent.

Judgment Evidence:

Since Decree Holder continuously absent, EP dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bank of Baroda (Age not specified years) Perumbavoor Branch, Building No. VII/484 A2,A3, Perumbavoor P O, Pin-683542

Defendants

Libu Eldose (24 years) Marangattu House, Allapra P O, Perumbavoor, Pin-683556 Eldose M K (53 years) Marangattu House, Allapra P O, Perumbavoor, Pin-683556

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
Enforcement Petition dismissed due to continuous absence of Decree Holder.
Evidence:
Since Decree Holder continuously absent, EP dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Perumbavoor
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases