Case Summary
The case involves Bank of Baroda as the decree holder against judgment debtors Libu Eldose and Eldose M K. The decree holder was absent during the proceedings, leading to the dismissal of the execution petition.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Execution Petition
Final Judgment
No
The execution petition was dismissed due to the continuous absence of the decree holder, Bank of Baroda.
Key Reasoning:
The decree holder was continuously absent.
The decree holder was continuously absent.
Why Defendant Won:
The decree holder was continuously absent.
The decree holder was continuously absent.
Supporting Evidence
Decree Holder absent. No representation.
Judgment Evidence:
Since Decree Holder continuously absent, EP dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Libu Eldose
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Eldose M K
- Party Age
- 53
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- T N Arunkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- G Santhosh Kumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Enforcement Petition dismissed due to continuous absence of Decree Holder.
Evidence:
Since Decree Holder continuously absent, EP dismissed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Execution Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Perumbavoor
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Libu Eldose et al regarding Enquiry Petition
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Libu Eldose et al regarding Enquiry Petition