Case Summary
The plaintiff, Bank of Baroda represented by its Branch Manager, filed the suit for realisation of money. The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed for default due to the absence of the plaintiff and no representation.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Bank of Baroda
- Relation
- Represented by
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Anjana S
- Party Age
- 28
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Asha
- Party Age
- 40
- Relation
- D/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Geetha
- Party Age
- 50
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abhisha.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
Plaintiff's suit dismissed for default due to absence and no representation.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Kollam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Kollam
Common Reasons
Recovery of money
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Anjana S et al regarding realisation of money
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda vs Anjana S et al regarding realisation of money