Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No. 277/2020

Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Bindu.T.M regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-28
Duration
approximately-5 years 10 months
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bank of Baroda is the plaintiff, which seeks to recover money from the defendant, Bindu.T.M, who failed to repay a loan. The defendant is liable to pay a total amount of ₹68,374 to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹68,374 with interest. If the payment is not made, the plaintiff can recover the amount from the defendant's assets.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay a total of ₹68,374 with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹68,374 with interest. If the payment is not made, the plaintiff can recover the amount from the defendant's assets.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved through uncontested evidence.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved through uncontested evidence.
Supporting Evidence
From the uncontested evidence of the PW1, I am of the opinion that the case of the plaintiff stands proved. There is no reason to disbelieve the evidence tendered by PW1.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 68,374/- (Rupees sixty eight thousand three hundred and seventy four only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank)
Relation
Represented by
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Bindu.T.M
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Loan Application Form, Loan Sanction letter, Loan Agreement cum hypothecation, Acknowledgment of Liability, True copy of Legal Notice, Postal Receipt, Computer print out of Statement of Account.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Santhosh G. Prabhu
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Deepa N.U
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Aswathy A
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover a total amount of 68,374/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the loan application made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the approval of the loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement cum hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defines the terms of the loan agreement established between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the defendant's acknowledgment of their liability to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: True copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served to the defendant regarding the loan repayment default.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the legal notice being sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account for the period from 25.09.2015 to 29.02.2020
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reflects the financial transactions and outstanding balance of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Money and Loan Recovery
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Bindu.T.M regarding realisation of money.
Case Code Year
Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Bindu.T.M regarding realisation of money.

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/28/2020 - 12:00
Case Closed
From
Tue, 07/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Thu, 07/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases

Case between Union Bank of India vs Dasan P.K. et al regarding Realization Of Money
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between HDFC Bank Limited vs Baby P C et al regarding non-repayment of home loan
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between State Bank of India vs Johnson N.D regarding loan repayment
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between IDBI Bank Limited vs Kudumbasree Div 7 NHG 16 Jyothis et al regarding realization of money
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Bank of India vs Shamna Basheer, Aysha Basheer regarding realization of money.
COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won