Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 277/2020

Case between Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) vs Bindu.T.M regarding realisation of money.

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-07-28
Duration
approximately-5 years 10 months

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Bank of Baroda is the plaintiff, which seeks to recover money from the defendant, Bindu.T.M, who failed to repay a loan. The defendant is liable to pay a total amount of ₹68,374 to the plaintiff.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court decreed the suit in favor of the plaintiff, ordering the defendant to pay ₹68,374 with interest. If the payment is not made, the plaintiff can recover the amount from the defendant's assets.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
The defendant is directed to pay a total of ₹68,374 with interest at 6% per annum.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The case of the plaintiff stands proved through uncontested evidence.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed as follows: The defendant is directed to pay to the plaintiff, an amount of 68,374/- (Rupees sixty eight thousand three hundred and seventy four only) with interest at the rate of 6% per annum (simple interest) from the date of institution of the suit, till its realisation from the defendant or from assets of defendant.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bank of Baroda (Erstwhile Vijaya Bank) (Age not specified years) Chottanikkara Branch, Woodlands building, Chottanikkara, Ernakulam

Defendants

Bindu.T.M (Age not specified years) Kalarikkal House, Kadungamangalam P.O, Ambadimala, Thiruvankulam, Ernakulam – 682 305

Reliefs

Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to recover a total amount of 68,374/- from the defendant.
Evidence:
I am of the opinion that the plaintiff is entitled to recover the same from the defendant, with interest from the date of suit.
Relief Type: Costs
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.
Evidence:
the plaintiff is entitled to the costs of the suit from the defendant.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Loan Application Form
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Used to establish the loan application made by the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Loan Sanction Letter
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Demonstrates the approval of the loan provided to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Loan Agreement cum hypothecation
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Defines the terms of the loan agreement established between the parties.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Acknowledgment of Liability
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Indicates the defendant's acknowledgment of their liability to repay the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: True copy of legal notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Served to the defendant regarding the loan repayment default.
Reference:
Ext.A5
Document Type: Postal receipt
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Evidence of the legal notice being sent to the defendant.
Reference:
Ext.A6
Document Type: Computer print out of Statement of Account for the period from 25.09.2015 to 29.02.2020
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Reflects the financial transactions and outstanding balance of the loan.
Reference:
Ext.A7

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Tue, 07/28/2020 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Bank

Similar Cases