Case Summary
The plaintiff, Balakrishna Ratnagiri Parthan, was absent and unrepresented in the case against defendant Kalpana Suseelan. As a result, the court dismissed the suit for default.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court found the plaintiff absent and dismissed the case due to lack of representation.
Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
The plaintiff was absent and did not represent the case.
Supporting Evidence
the plaintiff is neither present nor represented
Judgment Evidence:
the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Balakrishna Ratnagiri Parthan
- Party Age
- 61
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kalpana Suseelan
- Party Age
- 42
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Jagdese
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri Kishore.S.S (Kadakampally)
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sasthamangalam.S.Ajithkumar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
the suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2021