Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S No . 831/2022

Case between Bakers vs J. B Basmathi regarding dismissal of suit

Court
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Sri. Rohit Nandakumar
Order Date
2025-03-07
Duration

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff, Bakers, represented by its proprietor Kunjachan, was absent during the proceedings. The defendant, J. B Basmathi, represented by its proprietor Jithu George, was present and the court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court dismissed the case due to the plaintiff's absence and lack of representation.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Key Reasoning:
The defendant was present and the plaintiff was absent, leading to the dismissal of the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence dismissed.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Bakers (Age not specified years) Krishnaswamy Road, Pulleppady, Ernakulam

Defendants

J. B Basmathi (Age not specified years) Manakkad, Idukki

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The plaintiff was absent and not ready for evidence, leading to the suit being dismissed.
Evidence:
Plaintiff absent. No representation. Defendant represented. Plaintiff not present or ready for evidence in listed case. Hence dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Outcome Confidence
85%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases