Case Summary
The case involves A. Badarudeen as the plaintiff and P.Badarudeen as the defendant. The suit was dismissed as not pressed.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The suit was dismissed because the plaintiff chose not to press the matter further.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed. Pronounced in open court on this the 22nd day of February 2025.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- A. Badarudeen
- Party Age
- 66
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- P.Badarudeen
- Party Age
- 69
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Josh Rajan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dil Mohan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. N.G. Mahesh
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Evidence:
Suit dismissed as not pressed.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between A. Badarudeen vs P.Badarudeen regarding dismissal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between A. Badarudeen vs P.Badarudeen regarding dismissal of suit