Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No. 1559/2019

Case between Baby Prabhakaran vs P.K. Chandran regarding Partition

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
SMT. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2025-03-18
Duration
approximately-8 years 11 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiff and the defendant are siblings and the only legal heirs of their deceased parents. The plaintiff seeks a decree for partition of the inherited properties due to the defendant's non-cooperation.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The suit is decreed and a preliminary decree of partition is passed, with the property to be divided into equal shares between the plaintiff and defendant.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Preliminary decree of partition and separate possession of respective shares.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The plaintiff established her case through oral testimony and valid evidence without any rebuttal from the defendant.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the suit is decreed and a preliminary decree of partition is passed as given under; The plaint schedule property is found partiable.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Baby Prabhakaran (77 years) Venattuparambil, Kadebhagam, Palluruthy. P.O., Kochi- 682 006

Defendants

P.K. Chandran (67 years) Puthuvalsthalath, Pananbukadu, Mulavukadu Village, Vallarpadam P.O., Kochi-682504

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Decree for partition of plaint schedule property into two equal shares.
Evidence:
The plaint schedule properties are liable to be partitioned between plaintiff and defendant as sought for.
Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is entitled to get separate possession of her respective share.
Evidence:
The plaintiff is entitled to get separate possession of her respective shares.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Sale Deed No. 1765/1957 executed by Kathreena in favour of Parvathy, establishing ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Sale deed
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Sale Deed No. 1585/1958 executed by Joseph in favour of Krishnan, establishing ownership.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Petition Dated 04.02.2016 before the Tahsildar, seeking measurement and property sketch.
Reference:
Ext.A3
Document Type: Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of Notice Dated 07.06.2016 issued by Taluk Surveyor concerning measurement.
Reference:
Ext.A4
Document Type: Application
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Copy of petition No. 2018/2017 dated 09.10.2017 before Tahsildar, seeking survey.
Reference:
Ext.A5

Quick Facts

Location
ERNAKULAM
Case Filed
Tue, 01/01/2019 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases