Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.810/2023

Case between Baby E.T. vs Archbishop Andrews Thazhath regarding withdrawal of suit

Court
THE COURT OF THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR.
Order Date
2024-07-11
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Baby E.T. and John Jacob, filed a suit against the defendants, Archbishop Andrews Thazhath and Fr. Anthony Poothavelil. The case was dismissed as the plaintiffs filed a memo for withdrawing the suit since the prayer had become infructuous.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The plaintiffs withdrew their suit, resulting in its dismissal.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The plaintiffs withdrew their suit, resulting in its dismissal.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Baby E.T.
Party Age
64
Relation
S/o Late E.O. Thomas
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
John Jacob
Party Age
48
Relation
S/o. Jacob John
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Archbishop Andrews Thazhath
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Fr. Anthony Poothavelil
Party Age
69
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
A. Balagopalan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rajagopalan A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.N. Manmadan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Prabhu Murali Krishnan
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Viswanath Salish
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Amal A.R.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Jojo Paul Kalookaran
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Joshy P.O.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Granted
Description:
The suit is dismissed as the prayer has become infructuous.
Evidence:
Filed memo for withdrawing the suit since the prayer has become infructuous. Hence, suit is dismissed.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Baby E.T. vs Archbishop Andrews Thazhath regarding withdrawal of suit
Case Code Year
Case between Baby E.T. vs Archbishop Andrews Thazhath regarding withdrawal of suit

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Mon, 07/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Wed, 07/31/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won