O.S No. 562/2023

Case between B.A.Anish Anotny vs P.Vivek regarding withdrawal of suit

Court

COURT OF THE I ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM

Judge

Sri. Padmakumar.G.

Order Date

2024-03-25

Duration

Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

B.A.Anish Anotny filed a suit against P.Vivek, which was heard on March 25, 2024. The court delivered a judgment dismissing the suit as withdrawn.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The suit was dismissed as withdrawn after both parties represented themselves and filed a memo.

Key Reasoning:
The plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the suit.

Why Defendant Won:
The plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the suit.

Supporting Evidence

The plaintiff voluntarily withdrew the suit.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, Suit dismissed as withdrawn.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: B.A.Anish Anotny
Party Age: 37
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: P.Vivek
Party Age: 40
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: A.Balagopan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Rajagopalan A
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: M.N.Manmadan
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Sojo J Kallidukkil
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Amal A.R
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Syamsankar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: Johans Jacob P
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: P.K.Ravisankar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: V.Gopakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Granted

Description:

Suit dismissed as withdrawn

Evidence: