OS No. 47 / 2021

Case between Azhakan vs Suresh M.A et al regarding dismissal for default

Court

COURT OF THE MUNSIFF KOLENCHERY

Judge

Smt. Sirsha N A

Order Date

2024-05-25

Duration

Case Closed

Sat, 05/25/2024 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Azhakan is the plaintiff who filed a suit against Suresh M.A and others. The suit was dismissed for default as the plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Judgment Outcome

Judgment Favored

Defendant

Relief Granted

Case Type

Civil Suit

Final Judgment

The case was dismissed as the plaintiff did not appear in court despite several postings for a withdrawal memo.

Key Reasoning:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Why Defendant Won:
Plaintiff was absent and no representation was made.

Supporting Evidence

Plaintiff absent. No representation. Several time posted for withdrawal memo. Not seen to be filed.

Judgment Evidence:

Suit dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role: Plaintiff
Party Name: Azhakan
Party Age: 78
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Suresh M.A
Party Age: 45
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Sasi M.K
Party Age: 52
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Manoj
Party Age: 44
Relation: S/o

Party Role: Defendant
Party Name: Vinod
Party Age: 42
Relation: S/o

Plaintiffs Documents

Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: V.C.Rajesh
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: K.J Gladis
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Plaintiff
Advocate Name: T.P.Princy
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Party Role: Defendant
Advocate Name: C.K.Ajayakumar
Appearance Type: Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other

Outcome: Dismissed

Description:

The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's absence and no representation.

Evidence: