Case Summary
Ayisha filed a suit seeking eviction against Yahu, but the suit was dismissed due to absence of representation by Ayisha.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not mentioned
Case Type
Eviction Case
Final Judgment
No
The suit for eviction was dismissed due to the absence of representation from the plaintiff.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Suit for eviction. It is submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff that he has no instructions from his client. Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation. Hence the suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ayisha
- Party Age
- 47
- Relation
- Wife of Mammu
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Yahu
- Party Age
- 75
- Relation
- Son of Seethi
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. C. Shanmughan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. V.P. Sathar
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. E.M. Purushothman
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Eviction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Ayisha seeking eviction against Yahu
Evidence:
Suit for eviction. It is submitted by the counsel for the plaintiff that he has no instructions from his client. Name of the plaintiff called absent. No representation.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Eviction Case
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayisha vs Yahu regarding eviction
Case Code Year
Case between Ayisha vs Yahu regarding eviction