Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
ORIGINAL SUIT NO. 269 OF 2016

Case between Ayisha vs Moorkkath Koyakutty's Children et al regarding partition

Court
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Judge
Smt. Vincy.T.V.
Order Date
2017-06-05
Duration
Not mentioned
Case Closed
Mon, 06/05/2017 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ayisha filed a suit against Moorkkath Koyakutty's Children and others seeking partition of inherited properties after failed attempts to mutually divide the shares.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court passed a final decree for partition by allotting respective shares of properties to the parties according to the lawful compromise reached.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Partition of properties
Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Final Judgment
No
The court passed a final decree for partition by allotting respective shares of properties to the parties according to the lawful compromise reached.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Reason not clearly mentioned

Judgment Evidence:

Since the terms of compromise is lawful a final decree for partition is passed by metes and bounds as follows...

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayisha
Party Age
49
Relation
Daughter of Koyakutty
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Moorkkath Koyakutty's Children
Relation
Children of late Koyakutty
Plaintiffs Documents
Document number 405/1977, Partition deed number 310/1962
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. M.A. Ismail
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Mohamed Basil
Appearance Type
Assisting Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Partition
Outcome: Granted
Description:
To divide the inherited properties among the legal heirs through lawful compromise
Evidence:
Since the terms of compromise is lawful a final decree for partition is passed by metes and bounds as follows...

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Document Number 405/1977
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Establishing ownership of B schedule property from late Koyakutty
Reference:
Not mentioned
Document Type: Partition Deed Number 310/1962
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Proving ownership of C schedule property from Havva Umma
Reference:
Not mentioned

Case Classification

Case Type
Civil Suit - Partition
Category
Family Property and Partition
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ayisha vs Moorkkath Koyakutty's Children et al regarding partition
Case Code Year
Case between Ayisha vs Moorkkath Koyakutty's Children et al regarding partition

Case Flags

Out-of-Court Settlement

Quick Facts

Location
Tirur, Ponnani
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Case Filed
Sun, 06/05/2016 - 12:00
Case Closed
Mon, 06/05/2017 - 12:00
From
Thu, 06/01/2017 - 12:00
To
Fri, 06/30/2017 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
100%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Naseera et al vs Moideenkutty et al regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won
Case between Ammunni et al vs Velukkutty et al regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Partial
Case between M.S.Krishnakumari et al vs M.S.Unnikrishnan regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff of Tirur
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiffs
Case between Saseendran vs Lakshmi-D1 regarding partition
Court of the Munsiff Magistrate
Civil Suit - Partition Unknown
Case between Kallyani Gunasekharan et al vs M.Rajan regarding partition
Munsiff Magistrate Court
Civil Suit - Partition Plaintiff Won