Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
RENT CONTROL PETITION NO: 6/2025

Case between Ayanikkatt Thazhakkuni Appukkutty vs Meethale Olappurath Prajosh regarding eviction for non-payment of rent

Court
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Judge
Smt. Divya Natesan
Order Date
2025-06-10
Duration
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Ayanikkatt Thazhakkuni Appukkutty filed a petition against Meethale Olappurath Prajosh for failing to pay rent for a leased property. The court proceeded ex parte as the respondent did not appear.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court ordered the eviction of the respondent due to non-payment of rent.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Order of eviction granted, with costs.
Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Final Judgment
No
The court ordered the eviction of the respondent due to non-payment of rent.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner fulfilled the requirements for eviction under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
The petitioner fulfilled the requirements for eviction under Section 11(2)(b) of the Act.
Supporting Evidence
The foremost pre-requisit for such eviction is that the landlord must sent a registered notice to the tenant intimating the default and the tenant has failed to pay or tender the rent within 15 days from the date of notice or its refusal.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, an order of eviction is passed u/s. 11(2)(b) of the Act. The respondent is directed to vacate the petition schedule building and to put the landlord in vacant possession of the petition schedule building.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ayanikkatt Thazhakkuni Appukkutty
Party Age
70
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Meethale Olappurath Prajosh
Party Age
46
Relation
S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Copy of lawyer notice sent by Adv. C. R. Biju to the respondent with postal receipt, Postal Acknowledgment Card signed by Prajosh, Rent Agreement executed between Ayanikkatt Thazhakkuni Appukkutty and Meethale Olappurath Prajosh.
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
C. R. Biju
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Eviction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
An order of eviction was passed directing the respondent to vacate the petition schedule building.
Evidence:
In the result, an order of eviction is passed u/s. 11(2)(b) of the Act.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Lawyer Notice
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is a copy of the lawyer notice sent by the petitioner to the respondent demanding payment of rent.
Reference:
Ext.A1
Document Type: Postal Acknowledgment Card
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document is the postal acknowledgment card signed by the respondent confirming receipt of the lawyer notice.
Reference:
Ext.A2
Document Type: Rent Agreement
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
This document establishes the landlord-tenant relationship between the petitioner and respondent.
Reference:
Ext.A3

Case Classification

Case Type
Rent Control Petition
Category
Eviction and Rent Control
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Common Reasons
Non-payment of rent
Case Code
Case between Ayanikkatt Thazhakkuni Appukkutty vs Meethale Olappurath Prajosh regarding eviction for non-payment of rent
Case Code Year
Case between Ayanikkatt Thazhakkuni Appukkutty vs Meethale Olappurath Prajosh regarding eviction for non-payment of rent

Quick Facts

Location
Nadapuram, Kozhikode District
District
Kozhikode
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Nadapuram
Case Filed
Sat, 04/20/2024 - 12:00
Case Closed
Tue, 06/10/2025 - 12:00
From
Tue, 04/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Sun, 08/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
95%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Shajahan vs Ajeesh regarding eviction of tenant
IN THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between AYISU vs SHIBIN et al regarding eviction of tenants from the petition schedule shop room.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between SAYID et al vs CHIRAYIL M. ABDULLA regarding eviction from shop room
THE COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between NEDUMPARAMBIL BESSY et al vs VALLIL JAMAL regarding lease and rent control
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won
Case between Dr. V. P. RAJAN vs 1Adv. V. T. PRADEEP KUMAR et al regarding eviction of tenant
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, NADAPURAM
Rent Control Petition Plaintiff Won