Case Summary
The plaintiff Avarachan was absent and unrepresented in court. The defendants were present and the case was dismissed for default due to the continuous absence of the plaintiff.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The case was dismissed due to the plaintiff's absence after multiple hearings.
Key Reasoning:
The defendants were present, while the plaintiff failed to appear and provide any representation.
The defendants were present, while the plaintiff failed to appear and provide any representation.
Why Defendant Won:
The defendants were present, while the plaintiff failed to appear and provide any representation.
The defendants were present, while the plaintiff failed to appear and provide any representation.
Supporting Evidence
Plaintiff no representation. Defendant represented. Notice issued to counsel for the plaintiff returned as served.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Avarachan
- Party Age
- 85
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- M.U. George
- Party Age
- 67
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Kumari George
- Party Age
- 64
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Bhavya George
- Party Age
- 34
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Arun George D.
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Dinesh Mathew J. Murikkan
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Abhilash K.A.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Mohammed Thayib
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sreelakshmi R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sangeetharaj N.R.
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed due to the absence of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed for default.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Avarachan vs M.U. George et al regarding suit dismissal for default.
Case Code Year
Case between Avarachan vs M.U. George et al regarding suit dismissal for default.