Case Summary
Minor plaintiff represented by mother filed suit against various committees and the State of Kerala seeking mandatory injunction.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Not applicable
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit for a mandatory injunction citing non-payment of batta.
Key Reasoning:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Why Defendant Won:
Reason not clearly mentioned
Reason not clearly mentioned
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Pronounced by me in open court, this, the 8th day of February, 2018.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Avani.P.K
- Party Age
- 17
- Relation
- Minor, Represented by Mother and Natural Guardian
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- General Convenor, Kerala State School Sasthrolsavam
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Appeal committee Chairman, Malappuram District School Sasthrolsavam
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- State of Kerala, Represented by District Collector, Malappuram
Plaintiffs Documents
Not mentioned
Defendants Documents
Not mentioned
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Dinesh Pookkayil
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. P. Sreehari
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Mandatory Injunction
Outcome:
Not Decided
Description:
Seeking mandatory injunction against the defendants.
Evidence:
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit - Mandatory Injunction
Category
Injunction and Access Rights
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Claim for mandatory injunction
Case Code
Case between Avani.P.K et al vs General Convenor et al regarding mandatory injunction
Case Code Year
Case between Avani.P.K et al vs General Convenor et al regarding mandatory injunction