Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS.No. 2190/2014

Case between Aswathy Sudhakar, Syamala Devi vs V. Satheendra Babu regarding Counter Claim

Court
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Judge
Sri. Mithun Gopi.G.S
Order Date
2025-03-10
Duration
Case Code No.
2190
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aswathy Sudhakar and Syamala Devi filed a counter claim against V. Satheendra Babu. The court dismissed the counter claim for default as the plaintiffs were neither present nor represented.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The counter claim was dismissed for default due to the absence of the counter claim plaintiffs. No costs were awarded.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The counter claim was dismissed for default due to the absence of the counter claim plaintiffs. No costs were awarded.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence

Judgment Evidence:

Since, the counter claim plaintiffs are neither present nor represented, the counter claim is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aswathy Sudhakar
Party Age
34
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Syamala Devi
Party Age
62
Relation
W/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
V. Satheendra Babu
Party Age
58
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Remadevi
Party Age
52
Relation
W/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sri. G. Rajeev
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Smt. Salini R.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Unniraja T.I
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Faheem Ahsan.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Nandalal. H
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri.Sreejith.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Badusha.S
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Sreekanth S.G
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Sri. Joel Antony George
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The counter claim is dismissed for default.
Evidence:
the counter claim plaintiffs are neither present nor represented, the counter claim is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2014

Quick Facts

Location
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
80%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between Purushothaman Pillay Divakaran et al vs Deepti Sivan regarding injunction
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Sreenath.S vs Thankarajan et al regarding dismissal of suit as not pressed
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Defendant Won
Case between Sindhu.S et al vs Lalitha et al regarding withdrawal of suit
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF (RCC)
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Vanitha Sureshbabu Thilak vs Babu Chettiyar et al regarding permanent prohibitory injunction
COURT OF PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Anitha Kumari.L.K et al vs Madhu.S et al regarding an ad-interim injunction.
COURT OF ADDITIONAL MUNSIFF- III
Injunction Plaintiff Won