Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
OS 67/2024

Case between Aswalky Chacko vs Cherian K. Kalarickal regarding settlement of a dispute

Court
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Judge
Sri Praveen Kumar G.
Order Date
2025-03-08
Duration
Case Code No.
67
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aswalky Chacko and Cherian K. Kalarickal were involved in a dispute that was referred to the Lok Adalat for settlement. The parties agreed to settle the matter by handing over possession of a property in exchange for a sum of money.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The Lok Adalat facilitated a settlement between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the possession of a property. The settlement included a monetary agreement.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Defendant agreed to pay a lump sum of 5,00,000/- after obtaining possession.
Case Type
Adalat Petition
Final Judgment
No
The Lok Adalat facilitated a settlement between the plaintiff and defendant regarding the possession of a property. The settlement included a monetary agreement.
Why Plaintiff Won:
Parties mutually agreed upon a settlement during the Lok Adalat proceedings.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Parties mutually agreed upon a settlement during the Lok Adalat proceedings.
Supporting Evidence
The parties having agreed before us that there shall be an award in terms of settlement here to be made.

Judgment Evidence:

Both parties and their Advocates are present. Matter settled; plaintiff agreed to hand over vacant possession of the scheduled building to the defendant within a lump sum amount of 5,00,000/- (five lakh only) to the plaintiff.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Aswalky Chacko
Party Age
64
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Cherian K. Kalarickal
Party Age
45
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Adv. Binth Pramod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Defendant
Advocate Name
Adv. Asha Amlong
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Possession
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff agreed to hand over vacant possession of the scheduled building to the defendant.
Evidence:
Plaintiff agreed to hand over vacant possession of the plant schedules building to the defendant within to a lumpsum amount of 5,00,000/- (five lakh only) to the plaintiff.
Relief Type: Recovery
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Plaintiff is at liberty to realize the sum with interest in case of default by the defendant.
Evidence:
If the defendant fails to pay the aforesaid sum after obtaining the possession, the plaintiff is at liberty to realize the sum with interest at the rate of 6% per annum on the defaulted sum from the date of default from the defendant and his assets through the process of the Court.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Adalat Petition
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS
Case Code Year
2024

Case Flags

Adalath Resolved

Quick Facts

Location
Kottayam
District
Kottayam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Kottayam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sat, 03/01/2025 - 12:00
To
Mon, 03/31/2025 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
90%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between State Bank of India vs Nishana K C regarding decree of suit
Munsiff Court/Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Asset Sapphire Apartment Owners Association vs Amal Shaji et al regarding petition for document production
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Aniyamma Joseph et al vs Akhil Joseph et al regarding civil matters.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Unknown
Case between Ajitha Jibi vs Sherin Mathew et al regarding compromise petition.
Munsiff Court/ Judicial First Class Magistrate -IV, Kottayam
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won
Case between Surendran et al vs Daniel. K.P. et al regarding partition of property.
COURT OF THE MUNSIFF, KOTTAYAM
Civil Suit Plaintiff Won