Case Summary
Asir. M filed a complaint against Rashid. P.P for an offense under the Negotiable Instrument Act. The court found the accused not guilty due to the complainant's absence.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Criminal Case
Final Judgment
No
The court acquitted the accused due to the complainant's failure to appear and present evidence despite being given ample opportunities.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
The complainant not appeared before the Court for adducing evidence. Ample opportunities were already given to him. Eventhough he failed to appear before the Court.
Judgment Evidence:
In the result, the accused is acquitted. u/s. 256(1) Cr.P.C.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asir. M
- Party Age
- 25
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rashid. P.P
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Abdul Khader
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Nasir Ahammed. V.T
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Accused is acquitted u/s.256(1) Cr.P.C.
Evidence:
Hence the Accused is acquitted u/s.256 (1)Cr.P.C.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Criminal Case
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Malappuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Tirur / Rent Control Court
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Asir. M vs Rashid. P.P regarding offence under Negotiable Instrument Act.
Case Code Year
Case between Asir. M vs Rashid. P.P regarding offence under Negotiable Instrument Act.
Case Flags
Cheque-Related Case
Nature of Cheque Case
Cheque Dishonour under Section 138 N.I. Act