Case Summary
Ashok Kumar, a retired employee from the Kerala State Electricity Board, has filed a case against Rahul.B, an independent contractor, regarding an agreement on contract work and profit sharing. The main issue is the non-payment of Rs.7,00,000/- that Ashok Kumar claims he is entitled to.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Conditional attachment of property and security order against the defendant
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court has directed the defendant to furnish security or show cause regarding the non-payment. The application schedule property is conditionally attached.
Why Plaintiff Won:
The applicant made out a prima facie case indicating the defendant’s intention to defeat a potential decree.
The applicant made out a prima facie case indicating the defendant’s intention to defeat a potential decree.
Losing Side's Weaknesses:
Not available
Not available
Supporting Evidence
The applicant has made out a prima facie case and I am satisfied that the respondent with intent to obstruct or delay the execution of any decree that may be passed against him is about to dispose of the part of the petition schedule property.
Judgment Evidence:
The respondent/defendant is directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs.7,00,000/- or to appear and show cause why he should not furnish security.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Ashok Kumar
- Party Age
- 57
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Rahul.B
- Party Age
- 44
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Arun.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Sreelekshmi.R.S
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri. Sajeev S.R
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Smt.Rajani K.R
- Appearance Type
- Assisting Counsel
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The respondent is directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs.7,00,000/- or to appear and show cause why he should not furnish security.
Evidence:
Hence, the respondent/ defendant is directed either to furnish security for the sum of Rs.7,00,000/- or to appear and show cause why he should not furnish security.
Relief Type:
Other
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
The application schedule property is conditionally attached.
Evidence:
In the meantime, the application schedule property is conditionally attached.
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ashok Kumar vs Rahul.B regarding contract work and profit sharing
Case Code Year
Case between Ashok Kumar vs Rahul.B regarding contract work and profit sharing