Skip to main content
Niyamam AI Niyamam AI

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
  • About us
  • Contact
O.S. No.715/2021

Case between Ashik Abdul Salam et al vs Saji Shajahan regarding dismissal for default

Court
THE THIRD ADDL. MUNSIFF & RENT CONTROLLER, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. REEJA R. NAIR
Order Date
2024-09-12
Duration
Case Closed

Judgement document from eCourt website

Judgment Document
Save Case Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

The plaintiffs, Ashik Abdul Salam, Mahin Sakeer, and Sandhya S. Pillai, are involved in a case against the defendant, Saji Shajahan. The court dismissed the suit for default due to the plaintiffs' lack of interest in pursuing the case further.

Judgment Outcome

Defendant Won
Interim Order
The court found that the plaintiffs had not taken any steps to pursue the case despite specific directions, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Final Judgment
No
The court found that the plaintiffs had not taken any steps to pursue the case despite specific directions, leading to the dismissal of the suit for default.
Key Reasoning:
The court determined the plaintiffs lacked interest in prosecuting the case further.
Why Defendant Won:
The court determined the plaintiffs lacked interest in prosecuting the case further.
Supporting Evidence
Hence, this court is of the view that plaintiff is not interested to prosecute further with the case.

Judgment Evidence:

Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Parties Involved

Parties

Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Ashik Abdul Salam
Party Age
25
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Mahin Sakeer
Party Age
24
Relation
S/o
Party Role
Plaintiff
Party Name
Sandhya S. Pillai
Party Age
48
Relation
D/o
Party Role
Defendant
Party Name
Saji Shajahan
Party Age
30
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents

Advocates

Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
K.R. Vinod
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Rahul S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Sreerakha K.S.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
M.S. Letha
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Mohammed Razali K.A.
Appearance Type
Main Counsel
Party Role
Plaintiff
Advocate Name
Jacqueline Jackson
Appearance Type
Main Counsel

Reliefs

Relief Type: Other
Outcome: Dismissed
Description:
The suit was dismissed for default due to the plaintiff's lack of interest to prosecute further.
Evidence:
Hence, suit is dismissed for default.

Documents & Evidence

Case Classification

Case Type
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Common Reasons
Case Code
Case between Ashik Abdul Salam et al vs Saji Shajahan regarding dismissal for default
Case Code Year
Case between Ashik Abdul Salam et al vs Saji Shajahan regarding dismissal for default

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
District
Ernakulam
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Case Filed
Case Closed
From
Sun, 09/01/2024 - 12:00
To
Mon, 09/30/2024 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases

Case between The Managing Director, Channel Foods Pvt Ltd vs Kotak Mahindra General Insurance regarding decree execution.
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF
Execution Petition Defendant Won
Case between T.O Abraham et al vs T.O Aleyas et al regarding settlement of the suit
COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Dismissed
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Munsiff Court, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Pradeep vs Sumesh Balakrishnan et al regarding partnership deed
Court of Munsiff, Ernakulam
Civil Case Unknown
Case between Ammini M.N et al vs Sindhu et al regarding undisclosed matter
THE COURT OF THE PRINCIPAL MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Civil Suit Defendant Won