Case Summary
The plaintiffs, Asha Thampi, Baburaj, and Jithin Raj, were involved in a suit against the defendant, Saralamma.S. The suit was dismissed as neither party presented their case.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Defendant
Relief Granted
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
The court dismissed the suit due to the absence of the plaintiffs and the defendant, despite being represented. No evidence was presented.
Key Reasoning:
Why Defendant Won:
Supporting Evidence
Judgment Evidence:
Hence suit is dismissed.
Parties Involved
Parties
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Asha Thampi
- Party Age
- 54
- Relation
- W/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Baburaj
- Party Age
- 55
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Party Name
- Jithin raj
- Party Age
- 24
- Relation
- S/o
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Party Name
- Saralamma.S
- Party Age
- 78
- Relation
- D/o
Plaintiffs Documents
Defendants Documents
Advocates
- Party Role
- Plaintiff
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Robinson David
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
- Party Role
- Defendant
- Advocate Name
- Sri.Mridul John Mathew
- Appearance Type
- Main Counsel
Documents & Evidence
Case Classification
Case Type
Civil Suit
Category
Other Civil Cases
District
Thiruvananthapuram
State
Kerala
Court Establishment
Munsiff Court Thiruvananthapuram
Common Reasons
Case Code
OS.NO.
Case Code Year
2022