Case Summary
Aseeb filed a petition for a temporary prohibitory injunction against Nahas and others after his injunction suit was dismissed. The petitioner fears obstruction of access to his property.
Judgment Outcome
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Stay on the operation of the judgment for one month.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The petitioner demonstrated imminent threat of access obstruction, justifying the need for an interim stay.
The petitioner demonstrated imminent threat of access obstruction, justifying the need for an interim stay.
Judgment Evidence:
Hence I am inclined to grant a stay of operation of decree for a period of one month from the date of this order.
Parties Involved
Plaintiffs
Aseeb (65 years)
Afsal Mandiram, Nettoor P O, Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682040
Defendants
Nahas (63 years)
6124, Prestige Courtyard, Marine Drive, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682918
Fawas (41 years)
Afsal Mandiram, Nettoor P O, Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682040
Umaiba (67 years)
Afsal Mandiram, Nettoor P O, Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682040
Fanseena Fayas (38 years)
Nadakkaparambil, Changabuzha Nagar, Kalamassery, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682033
Reliefs
Relief Type:
Injunction
Outcome:
Granted
Description:
Stay of operation of the decree for a period of one month to allow the petitioner to file an appeal.
Evidence:
Hence in my opinion, it is only just and equitable that an appropriate interim order has to be passed in favour of the petitioner so that the right of the petitioner to file an appeal against the decree urgently and move the Appellate Court for appropriate interim orders, shall not be frustrated.
Documents & Evidence
Document Type:
Court Judgment
Submitted By:
Plaintiff
Relevance:
The judgment dated 23/06/2025 is referenced as it is the basis for the application seeking a stay on its operation.
Reference: