Skip to main content
Niyamam AI- Beta Niyamam AI- Beta

Main navigation

  • Home
  • Lawyer Login
  • Lawyer Registration
O.S. No.626/2022

Case between Aseeb vs Nahas et al regarding Injunction

Court
COURT OF MUNSIFF, ERNAKULAM
Judge
Smt. Needi.K.Dinamany.
Order Date
2025-03-01
Duration
approximately-2 years 19 days

Judgement document from eCourt website

Open judgment PDF (eCourt)
Find Similar Cases

Case Summary

Aseeb, the plaintiff, is seeking an injunction against Nahas and others to prevent them from obstructing access to a pathway essential for ingress and egress to his property. The dispute centers around a pathway that both parties claim rights over, established through an oral agreement.

Judgment Outcome

Plaintiff Won
Interim Order
The court partially accepted the plaintiff's petition to issue summons to a witness while denying the request to summon the first defendant as a witness. The parties will bear their respective costs.
Judgment Favored
Plaintiff
Relief Granted
Witness list accepted only with respect to 2nd witness.
Case Type
Civil Suit
Final Judgment
No
Why Plaintiff Won:
The court found it appropriate to accept the witness list regarding the 2nd witness for proper adjudication of the case.

Judgment Evidence:

In the result, the petition is allowed partly. Witness list is accepted only with respect to 2nd witness. Issue summons to 2nd witness in the witness list.

Parties Involved

Plaintiffs

Aseeb (65 years years) Afsal Mandiram, Nettoor P O, Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682040

Defendants

Nahas (62 years years) 6124, Prestige Courtyard, Marine Drive, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682918 Fawas (40 years years) Afsal Mandiram, Nettoor P O, Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682040 Umaiba (66 years years) Afsal Mandiram, Nettoor P O, Maradu Village, Kanayannoor Taluk, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682040 Fanseena Fayas (37 years years) Nadakkaparambil, Changabuzha Nagar, Kalamassery, Ernakulam District, Pin- 682033

Reliefs

Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Partly Granted
Description:
The petitioner seeks to array the 1st defendant as the witness on behalf of the plaintiff.
Evidence:
On perusal of affidavit accompanying the petition, counter affidavit and the decisions cited above this court is of view that summons need not be issued to 1st witness in the witness list ie, the 1st defendant to the suit.
Relief Type: Injunction
Outcome: Granted
Description:
Issuance of summons to the 2nd witness in the witness list.
Evidence:
Issue summons to 2nd witness in the witness list.

Documents & Evidence

Document Type: Witness List
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
Document related to the witnesses whom the plaintiff intends to summon.
Reference:
Document Type: Oral Evidence
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
The plaintiff was examined as PW1 in the above case.
Reference:
Document Type: Exhibits
Submitted By: Plaintiff
Relevance:
These exhibits were marked during the proceedings.
Reference:
Exts.A1 to A4

Quick Facts

Location
Ernakulam
Case Filed
Fri, 03/11/2022 - 12:00
Outcome Confidence
75%

Involved Entities

Similar Cases